Superior Bargaining Power and the Global Food Value Chain: The Wuthering Heights of Holistic Competition Law?

13.05.2016 913
Back to Publications
Working paper

Superior Bargaining Power and the Global Food Value Chain: The Wuthering Heights of Holistic Competition Law?

CLES Research Paper Series. K10, K21, L4, L40, Q10. University College London - CLES, 2016

Lianos I.Lombardi C.

In this paper we analyse the role of superior bargaining power in competition law and policy in the agri-food value chain. Conventional approaches to competition law based on a neoclassical price theory perspective tend to neglect or to stay opaque on the role of bargaining power in competition law. However, national competition authorities and national legislators seem to be less biased by specific theoretical approaches and have increasingly engaged with the application of the concept of bargaining power in competition law. In this paper we discuss both positions and set a general theoretical framework, the global value chain approach, to better understand the interactions between suppliers and retailers in the food sector. Finally, we observe the framing of new tools of competition law intervention at national level, in order to deal with situations of superior bargaining power in specific settings related to the food value chain.

Related content

23.10.2017 Article
Merger Activity in the Factors of Production Segments of the Food Value Chain: A Critical Assessment of the Bayer/Monsanto merger
The article studies the Bayer/Monsanto merger which forms part of the recent wave of mega-mergers that has transformed the structure of the factors of production segments of the global food value chain in recent decades.
Katalevsky D., Lianos I.
CLES Policy Paper Series. G34, K10, K21, L4, L40, Q10, Q13, Q18. Centre for Law, Economics and Society, Faculty of Laws, UCL, 2017. No. 2017/1.
17.10.2017 Article
Abuse of Superior Bargaining Power and the Application of Chinese Anti-Monopoly Law
The article studies superior bargaining power which arises when one trading partner becomes dependent on the other. It can be abused to exploit the counterparty or to grab profits within a product value chain. It is necessary to apply antimonopoly law to superior bargaining power because, firstly, abuse of a superior bargaining power distorts the product value chain and, finally, leads to higher prices or a decline in product quality
Quiang Yu.
Competition Policy Research. 2016. No. 4. P. 64-75.
10.03.2016 Article
Competition Law and Policy and the Food Value Chain
This On-Topic revisits the complex issues rising in the food sector and its value chain. Both the European Union and the US competition authorities have scrutinized relationships between food chain actors.
Lianos I., Claudio Lombardi, Moss D. L., Carstensten P., MacDonald J. M.
Iss. 1-2016: Concurrences Review. NY: The Institute of Competition Law, 2016.